Requite of the Fates by Venus Campbell
Spoiler Warning: This post contains mild spoilers
Introduction
To be loved by a god is not a blessing. It is a consuming fire that threatens to burn away everything that makes you human — your choices, your boundaries, your very sense of self. Most of us have encountered love that felt too large, too demanding, too hungry. Now imagine that love wielded by a being for whom your entire civilization is little more than an entertaining distraction.
This is the dark heart of Requite of the Fates. I don’t romanticize divine attention. I actualize it with the full weight of its terror — the invisible touch that can’t be refused, the possessive gaze that follows you across centuries, the chilling realization that to an immortal, a human is simultaneously precious and disposable. Dionysus, the Conset who calls himself a god, does not love the way mortals love. He wants, with the absolute authority of a being who has never been told no.
What unfolds in these pages is a story about the difference between obsession and love — and why that distinction might be the most important question any of us ever answer. The book opens a wound in the romantic mythology of divine favor and refuses to let it close easily.
The Golden Cage of Divine Attention
From the very first pages of Requite of the Fates, Dionysus's presence is conceptualized not as warmth but as pressure. He observes Areadne from above, through the roof of his own temple, studying her grief and her power with the detached fascination of a collector who has spotted something rare. The language I use is deliberately suffocating — his desire is not tender, it is acquisitive. He does not ask. He calculates.
The invisible caresses in the temple sequence are among the most unsettling passages in the book, precisely because they are framed as intimacy. Areadne feels warmth, feels touch, feels something she cannot name or refuse — and the reader understands, with a slow creeping dread, that this is not romance. This is possession dressed in jasmine and candlelight. The scent of jasmine, which recurs throughout the text, becomes something double-edged: beautiful and suffocating in equal measure.
Gods in generally, and Greek gods specifically, are not romantic divine entities. They are vengeful, fickle beings who care little for the disruption and heartache their presence in the lives of humans creates. As a student of classical mythology, I felt compelled to craft my alien gods as close as possible to their original source material. That material, a product of its authors and its times, is not so flattering under the microscope of contemporary morality. And that’s okay. The debasement and dehumanization and devaluing of human beings is an important component of human history which should be understood, not erased.
We must understand the unpalatable segments of our history to understand ourselves and to grow beyond those understandings. As the god of “acts without reason”, Dionysus is the ready-made god representation of humanity’s slow yet evolving self-awareness. The subtext of an evolving civil society is a story layer I enjoyed weaving into the book.
Still, what makes Dionysus so compelling as an antagonist — and he is, at least initially, an antagonist — is that I never let him be simply monstrous. His temper shifts without warning. His tenderness is real, but it coexists with a capacity for violence that he cannot fully control. He is many actions without reason, as the text defines him, and that irrationality is not charming. It is dangerous. The book understands something that many mythological retellings shy away from: absolute power does not make love safer. It makes love catastrophic.
The Contrast of Mortal Connection
Set against the suffocating grandeur of divine obsession, the connection between Marly and Nate reads like oxygen. It is messy, resistant, and deeply human — built not on power but on the shared vulnerability of two people who are equally lost, equally afraid, and equally stubborn about admitting it.
The relationship I construct between these two characters is a love that requires negotiation. Nate cannot simply take what he wants from Marly — she pushes back, literally and figuratively, from the moment they meet. Their dynamic is grounded in the friction of two strong personalities who must choose, repeatedly and consciously, to move toward each other rather than away. There is no invisible wind bending her toward him. There is no cosmic authority compelling her compliance. There is only two people, facing the end of the world, deciding that the other person is worth the risk.
This contrast is where the book's thematic argument lives. I am not saying mortal love is perfect — Nate's early behavior is self-absorbed, and Marly's walls are formidable enough to be their own kind of barrier. But mortal love, I insist, is equal. It can be refused. It can be earned. It can be lost. And that fragility, that shared mortality, is precisely what gives it weight. A love that cannot be lost is not love. It is ownership.
The moments where Marly and Nate face genuine danger together — where neither of them has any power beyond their own courage and their trust in each other — are the emotional core of the novel. I wrote these scenes with a rawness that my divine sequences, for all their sensory richness, simply cannot replicate. Divinity dazzles. Humanity aches. And it is the ache that stays with you.
Conclusion
A love that strips away your agency is not love at all. It is a beautifully disguised cage — gilded with jasmine, perfumed with power, and locked from the outside.
Requite of the Fates earns its title precisely because it refuses to let that cage go unexamined. I ask readers to sit with the discomfort of desire that does not respect boundaries, and then I offer something radical: the possibility that the most extraordinary love available to us is the one that asks permission.
Dionysus's arc across the novel is, in its own way, a story about what it costs an immortal to learn that lesson. The transformation he undergoes — and what he must surrender to truly love rather than simply possess — is one of the book's most quietly devastating threads. It suggests that love, real love, requires the willingness to become vulnerable. Even gods, it turns out, are not exempt from that demand.
So here is the question the book leaves burning: Do you prefer your fictional romances built on equal footing, where love is chosen freely by both parties? Or do you find yourself drawn to the dark tension of a power imbalance — the dangerous pull of a love that is too large, too consuming, too divine to be entirely safe? Requite of the Fates holds space for both impulses, and then shows you the difference between what thrills and what endures. Beware the love of gods. Uncover the obsession in Requite of the Fates.
<<<<Perfect for fans of The Song of Achilles and A Touch of Darkness, this interracial time-travel romance is a Greek mythology retelling of the Theseus and the Minotaur that follows war photojournalist, Marly Broadie, surviving on grit and grief as she encounters Emissary Nate Wayne, under the control of aliens.>>>>> Order your Ebook copy TODAY!
